Friday, 12 December 2008

Santander to cut 1,900 UK jobs

Having saved a number of UK banks and building societies from the brink of collapse, it is now only reasonable that Santander consolidate their enlarged business but removing those jobs that have either become over staffed or unnecessary following their acquisition of Abbey, the Alliance & Leicester and Bradford & Bingley.

Today they announced 1,900 job cuts in the UK as they seek to consolidate their business activities.

This highlights the fact that even if a business is saved from failure, it is unlikely that all staff will be kept on. Nevertheless, had Santander not stepped in in the first place it seems inevitable that many more jobs would have been lost. It is time to be thankful for small graces in these turbulent times.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 11 December 2008

Bank of America job cuts

Even though I said it isn't just banks and financial institutions that are cutting jobs, this sector continues to announce massive redundancies worldwide.

Today we learn of another big bank that is planning on making major headcount reductions. The Bank of America has said that they will cut 30,000 jobs, or 11% of their workforce over the next three years.

Given that this follows their purchase of Merrill Lynch it seems that most of these job cuts will occur in the US, but other centres such as London and Frankfurt are likely to suffer.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, 10 December 2008

Sony job cuts

Sony have shown once again that the current economic downturn and job cuts are not limited to the banking and financial sectors.

Sony have announced that 16,000 jobs will be cut from their worldwide operations, a significant number of these will be in Asia.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, 8 December 2008

Light at the end of the tunnel?

It has been a couple of months since the Lehman Brothers and the subsequent fall out. Over the last few months it seems that things in the financial markets have stabilised and because of global government actions we shouldn't see too many more major financial institutions collapsing. I'm sure some firms will get into trouble but for now I don't think another Lehman's will happen - particularly as Citi was rescued.

Sadly the downturn in the wider economy is still in full force and likely to get worse before it gets better. Nevertheless, with interest rate cuts, falling prices, government fiscal stimuli and the early indications of stability in the financial markets could we be reaching a bottom?

Well it seems possible that we might be reaching the bottom in financial markets. Equity prices seem to be very undervalued and presenting great opportunities to those with capital to invest.

Sadly the real economy lags the stock market and will continue to weaken over the next six months before reaching anything like a bottom. In countries like the UK the bottom is likely to take much longer.

As the real economy falters this will have a negative impact upon financial markets once more, limiting the extent of the rebound, and keeping us bouncing along the bottom for some time yet.

Being full of seasonal joy I am optimistic that this is the light at the end of the tunnel that we've all been looking for...I just hope that that light isn't a train coming in the opposite direction.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 27 November 2008

Collapse of Woolworths and what the government can do!

So Woolworths has be honest it’s not that surprising. In these tough times it was one of those stores that were definitely going to struggle. Although these stores have dominate many UK and international high streets for about a century anyone who has been into one lately will have realised that the store format was thoroughly dated and fading fast. It seems almost inevitable that without a substantial change Woollies would fade and die.

Some might argue that recessions are good for this sort of thing, doing away with those businesses that have fallen behind the times and are no longer efficient or desirable in a modern economy. In many ways this is true, however, the size of Woolworths could have a much wider adverse impact in the current market.

In the long run customers will forget Woolworths, spending will move to other stores and the old Woolworths space will be filled. However, in the short run other successfully run companies may not be able to cope with the transition caused by the collapse. For example Woollies had a substantial supply chain across the country supplying a variety of products.

In more normal times these supplies may have been able to rely on debt whilst they wait for demand to come from the other stores that pick up the custom from Woolworths. However without the credit markets supplies cannot get the debt to make this happen. Therefore this part of the supply chain is likely to fail.

Also of worry is the problems faced by many retails that are unable to get credit insurance. This is one of the problems that led to the sudden collapse of Woolworths. With a lack of debt and liquidity in the economy, insurers are unable or unwilling to provide suppliers with credit insurance. In normal times, retailers buy goods from supplies on credit and pay them back as they sell the goods, and the retailers take out credit insurance to protect against the retailer going bust. Without this insurance the supply has to demand upfront payment from retailers which runs down retailer's available cash and can leave them without available funds to continue trading.

Unless something is done able available credit insurance other retailers will go bust, retailers that are far better prepared for the current market downturn than Woolworths. If more retailers go bust then more suppliers will go bust and the efficient retail supply chain that has been constructed will break down.

This is again an example of where the government should have acted rather than cutting VAT and the other broad brush measures announced in the pre-budget report. The current downturn required targeted solutions, not crude populist announcements.

The French government announced this week that they were actively considering providing guarantees for supplier credit insurance. This is an excellent idea that should be high on the Treasury's agenda. If not more retailers will fail, unemployment will rise rapidly and the high street will lose some much loved stores in a years time.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 26 November 2008

Pre-budget report - political and bad for the economy

The UK pre-budget report announced on Tuesday, this has to be one of the biggest anticlimax announcements in history. It really was a case of the Chancellor trying to be all things to all men and in the end actually not doing much at all...and in some ways probably doing more harm.

There are specific problems in the economy, most notably in the banking sector. These problems require a targeted approach, with substantial sums of money.

What we got was a costly and broad brush approach that seemed to be more concerned with headlines than strategy. Once again the Chancellor went for big headlines and indeed he managed to get them...sadly for Mr Darling they were mainly negative.

Two big headlines emerged. The first was the cut in VAT. On the surface this seemed like a reasonable way to get people spending again. But will it really? Saving 2.5% isn't likely to make that much of a difference to most consumers, especially in the face of rising unemployment and economic uncertainty. Many will choose to put this money in the bank.

The VAT cut is also highly costly for businesses. It is estimated that changing to 15% and then back to 17.5% will cost retailers over £300m in admin costs as they change the tills and re-write prices. Indeed, many smaller retailers will decide it will be better to pocket the VAT cut themselves instead of paying the admin fees.

The other big headline from the PBR was the outlook for taxation in 2011 and beyond. We were told that those earning over £150,000 would pay a new top rate of tax of 45% - so much for simplifying the tax system but cutting out tax bands. This again is a purely political stunt. It will only impact upon a few higher earners and as such will raise just over a billion pounds, not nearly enough to cover the required tax increases necessary to fill to budget deficit.

Most people will be unfazed and unaffected by the rise in income tax, most people, myself included are a long way away from the £150,000 threshold. They may think it is morally justified that those earning more should pay not only a greater amount in tax but also a greater proportion of their salary to the state. Indeed, some may believe that the rich caused this recession and therefore they should be punished for it.

This is of course nonsense. Firstly we all had a part to play in the current downturn. From the government's poor regulation of financial organisations, financial organisations that failed to calculate risk properly and consumers who decided that taking out an 120% mortgage on a house was a good idea even though a slight change in interest rates would put them into default. We all got giddy in the last couple of years so we should all shoulder some of the blame.

Secondly we live in a tax competitive world and therefore it will have an impact upon all of us if taxes are increased. Not only will higher taxation reduce the incentives to work harder, take risks and get the rewards of higher paid jobs, it will also discourage people to work or set up businesses in the UK. Many of the people at large multinational businesses who decide to set up in the UK are the senior management who, if they come here, will fall into the top tax rates. If they see that they can move to New York and pay only a 35% tax rate or Saudi Arabia and pay nearly no tax then they have an incentive not to come here.

You may say so be it, if they don't want to contribute to society then they can go elsewhere. But these companies are contributing to society in a massive way. They provide the country with jobs, taxable income, skills and encourage the growth of other firms who supply them.

There are some people in the UK who need to stop thinking that wealth is a sign of greed and start to think of it as a sign of success. These people have done well (in general) because they have worked hard, were clever and were successful. They are the leaders of our society and their success breeds success for the rest of us.

Fair enough things aren't working that well at the moment, but things won't get any better by discouraging talented individuals from remaining in the country, working hard, taking risks and reaping the rewards that we all, directly or indirectly benefit from.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, 22 November 2008

Recession and job losses

With the globe entering recession many jobs are going to be cut across the whole world over the next 12 months and perhaps beyond.

Just this week major companies around the globe announced over 80,000 job cuts. Firms in the US are shedding jobs at a rapid pace, UK unemployment is expected to double over the next year and European unemployment, which had been falling sharply in previous years has begun to increase again.

These job losses are not only going to be in the financial sector, although there will be a lot of job losses in this sector. Citigroup alone is expecting to reduce headcounts by 75,000. However, jobs are being lost across the board in construction, retail, business services, manufacturing etc. The only place that employees can feel fairly confident of job security is in the public sector, however, I wouldn't be complacent anywhere!

Things are looking fairly bleak at the moment as we are currently in the heart of the storm. I'm not saying that the storm is not going to get worse but sometimes when you are in a downturn it seems like it will never end.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,